![]() ![]() What this means is that, when we choose a matrix organization structure, we are deliberately trading some clarity in return for more flexibility. In a sense then, a matrix organization structure is a recognition that we cannot choose which of these is more important, so we need a structure that allows them to be balanced and prioritized on a daily basis. Instead of choosing a dominant organizing principle we choose to reflect all of these important strands in our structure, we have solid lines to product group and function, dotted lines to geography etc… Companies realize that geography is important but so is function, and so is customer grouping, product and technology. Since then many thousands of organizations, often prompted by the large strategy consultancies, have adopted the matrix organization structure to help deal with internal and external complexity.Īt its simplest, the matrix organization structure just reflects this external complexity in the internal structure. Matrix organization structures were introduced in the airspace industry in the 50s to cope with complex projects. See more in our book Making the Matrix Work ![]() However, a matrix organization structure also introduces a higher level of internal complexity and some additional people management challenges, so there must be significant advantages to a matrix organization structure that outweigh the matrix people management challenges. Geography, function, technology, business unit and technology (among others) are important, so why not recognize this reality in our matrix organizations structure. A matrix organization structure introduces, or at least recognizes, the real life complexity of our business environment. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |